Nutrient

1 The APSIM Nutrient Model

The soil nutrient model includes functionality for simulating pools of organic matter and mineral nitrogen. The processes for each are described below.

This work builds upon earlier APSIM soil organic matter models such as SoilN (Probert et al., 1998).

The N pools / flows simulate the nitrate content of each soil layer. Much of the capability has been taken from implementation in the APSIM SoilN model (Probert et al., 1998), which was derived from approaches in CERES-Maize ([jones_ceres-maize:_1986]).

1.1 Structure

Soil organic matter is modelled as a series of discrete organic matter pools which are described in terms of their masses of carbon and nutrients. These pools are initialised according to approaches specific to each pool. Organic matter pools may have carbon flows, such as a decomposition process, associated to them. These carbon flows are also specific to each pool, are independently specified, and are described in each case in the documentation for each organic matter pool below.

Mineral nutrient pools (e.g. Nitrate, Ammonium, Urea) are described as solutes within the model. Each pool captures the mass of the nutrient (e.g. N,P) and they may also contain nutrient flows to describe losses or transformations for that particular compound (e.g. denitrification of nitrate, hydrolysis of urea).

1.2 Pools

A nutrient pool class is used to encapsulate the carbon and nitrogen within each soil organic matter pool. Child functions within these classes provide information for initialisation and flows of C and N to other pools, or losses from the system.

The soil organic matter pools used within the model are described in the following sections in terms of their initialisation and the carbon flows occurring from them.

1.3 Solutes

The soil mineral nutrient pools used within the model are described in the following sections in terms of their initialisation and the flows occurring from them.

2 Validation

The Soil Nutrient model has been tested on a variety of datasets studying the impact of management (tillage, cropping rotation, nitrogen management) on soil carbon, nitrogen and crop productivity for a range of soil types and environments.

2.1 Map

2.2 Australia

Test data are provided for three locations across Australia, ranging from warmer subtropical Queensland, through to cooler temperature locations in southern Australia.

2.2.1 Tarlee

This Rotation Trial (Schultz, 1995) was located near the township of Tarlee (34.28 S, 138.77E) in South Australia from 1979 to 1996. It was established on a Red Brown Earth to monitor the long term effects of rotations on soil properties and crop production. In this test, we use data for continuous wheat, and wheat-fallow rotations with 3 stubble treatments (burning, incorporation, retention) and 3 Nitrogen rates (0,40,80 kg/ha).

Experiment Name Design (Number of Treatments)
Tarlee Rotation x Stubble x N (18)

2.2.2 Hudson

This dataset demonstrates cropping system performance and soil carbon dynamics under continuous winter cereal versus perrenial pasture. The cropping and pasture systems experiment was established in August 1994 on the farming property ‘Hudson’ located in the foothills of the Liverpool Ranges (31.758S, 150.458E; average annual rainfall 684mm with some summer dominance, average annual pan evaporation 1718 mm). Further details about the experiment and the data can be found at Young et al., 2009 and Paydar et al., 2005.

Experiment Name Design (Number of Treatments)
Hudson Treatment (2)

2.2.3 Brigalow Catchment Study

This dataset was originally simulated using APSIM by Huth et al., 2010. The study was conducted near Theodore, Queensland, Australia (24.81°S, 149.80°E). Several catchments were monitored under different land uses following clearing of native Brigalow Forest (Acacia Harpophylla). Data for part of the cropping catchment are used here.

Experiment Name Design (Number of Treatments)
Brigalow Catchment (1)

2.2.4 Horsham

Experiment Name Design (Number of Treatments)
Horsham Treatment (3)

2.3 North America

2.3.1 Pendleton

The Pendleton Long Term Experiment (Rasmussen et al., 1998) was established in 1931 at Oregon State University’s Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center near Pendleton, OR (45.72 N, 118.63 W). It consisted of nine treatments consisting of crop residue (fall burn, spring burn, and no burn) and fertility (0, 45, and 90 kg N/ha, manure, and pea vine) management practices under a Winter Wheat-Summer Fallow system. All plots were tilled using a moldboard plow, cultivated, and rod-weeded to control weeds.

Experiment Name Design (Number of Treatments)
Pendleton Treatment (9)

3 Sensibility

3.1 N2O

N2O emmisions are modelled by the APSIM Nutrient model. Further work is encouraged to test and improve this part of the model. Till then, sensibility tests are conducted to ensure that the results from the model meet basic expectations from previous studies.

This very simple sensibility test ensures that the following criteria hold for a range of different farming systems across different geographical locations:

  1. Oil Palm in Papua New Guinea
  2. Wheat in Southern Queensland, Australia.
  3. Sugarcane in Northern Queensland, Australia
  4. Maize in Malawi, Africa.

Tests check that the following are maintained:

  1. Total annual N2O losses from denitrification are relatively low (less than 25 kg N/ha/y)
  2. N2O losses from denitrification lie within 10% and 25% of total N losses from denitrification
  3. Total annual N2O losses from nitrification are very low (less than 3 kg N/ha/y)

3.2 Incubation

Experiment Name Design (Number of Treatments)
Incubation Temperature x InitialP (6)

4 Interface

4.1 Nutrient

Parameters (Inputs)

Name Description Units Type Value
DirectedGraphInfo DirectedGraph APSIM.Shared.Graphing.DirectedGraph
ResourceName String Nutrient
Text String
Text String
Expression String
Text String
Expression String
Text String
Expression String
Text String
FixedValue double
Text String
Expression String
Text String
Expression String
Text String
FixedValue double
DestinationNames String
DestinationFraction double
PotentialRate double
VariableName String
Text String
Expression String
Text String
Expression String
Text String
FixedValue double
DestinationNames String
DestinationFraction double
PotentialRate double
VariableName String
Text String
Expression String
Text String
Expression String
Text String
FixedValue double
DestinationNames String
DestinationFraction double
PotentialRate double
VariableName String
Text String
Expression String
Text String
Expression String
Text String
Expression String
Text String
FixedValue double
FixedValue double
DestinationNames String
DestinationFraction double
Text String
PropertyName String
StringValue String
Text String
FixedValue double
FixedValue double
VariableName String
VariableName String
Text String
Expression String
Text String
Expression String
Text String
Expression String
Text String
DestinationNames String
DestinationFraction double
Text String
PotentialRate double
FixedValue double
PropertyName String
StringValue String
X double
Y double
VariableName String
X double
Y double
VariableName String
MineralisationSTBase double
MineralisationSTOpt double
Expression String
X double
Y double
VariableName String
FixedValue double
FixedValue double
SourceName String
DestinationName String
Text String
FixedValue double
FixedValue double
FixedValue double
SourceName String
Text String
DenitrificationRateModifier double
IsInertActive boolean
FixedValue double
FixedValue double
N2ODiffusionCoefficient double
Text String
SourceName String
DestinationName String
Text String
PotentialNitrificationRate kg/ha/d double
ConcentrationAtHalfMax ppm double
FixedValue double
FixedValue double
FixedValue double
Text String
sourceName String
destinationName String
VariableName String
VariableName String
sourceName String
destinationName String
VariableName String
VariableName String
VariableName String
FixedValue double

Properties (Outputs)

Name Description Units Type Settable?
Structure IStructure True
Inert IOrganicPool True
Microbial IOrganicPool True
Humic IOrganicPool True
FOMCellulose IOrganicPool True
FOMCarbohydrate IOrganicPool True
FOMLignin IOrganicPool True
NO3 ISolute True
NH4 ISolute True
Urea ISolute True
FOM IOrganicPool True
TotalC kg/ha double False
Catm kg/ha double False
Natm kg/ha double False
N2Oatm kg/ha double False
DenitrifiedN kg/ha double False
NitrifiedN kg/ha double False
HydrolysedN kg/ha double False
MineralisedN kg/ha double False
Organic IOrganicPool False
TotalOrganicN kg/ha double False
FOMCNRFactor double False
CNRF double False
MineralN kg/ha double False
TotalN kg/ha double False

Links (Dependencies)

Name Type IsOptional?
summary ISummary False
soilPhysical IPhysical False
nutrientPools OrganicPool False
nutrientFlows NFlow False
surfaceResidue OrganicPool False

Methods (callable from manager)

Name Description
DoIncorpFOM void DoIncorpFOM(FOMLayerType FOMdata)Incorporate the given FOM C and N into each layer
IncorpFOMPool void IncorpFOMPool(FOMPoolType FOMPoolData)Partition the given FOM C and N into fractions in each layer (FOM pools)
Reset void Reset()
AddSolute void AddSolute(Solute solute)Add a solute.

5 References

Huth, N. I., Thorburn, P. J., Radford, B. J., Thornton, C. M., 2010. Impacts of fertilisers and legumes on N2O and CO2 emissions from soils in subtropical agricultural systems: A simulation study. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 136 (3-4), 351-357.

Paydar, Z., Huth, N., Ringrose-Voase, A., Young, R., Bernardi, T., Keating, B., Cresswell, H., 2005. Deep drainage and land use systems. Model verification and systems comparison. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56 (9), 995-1007.

Probert, M. E., Dimes, J. P., Keating, B. A., Dalal, R. C., Strong, W. M., 1998. APSIM's Water and Nitrogen Modules and Simulation of the Dynamics of Water and Nitrogen in Fallow Systems. Agricultural Systems 56 (1), 1-28.

Rasmussen, P E, Albrecht, S L,, Smiley, R W, 1998. Soil C and N changes under tillage and cropping systems in semi-arid Pacific Northwest agriculture. Soil and Tillage Research 47, 197-205.

Schultz, J.E., 1995. Crop production in a rotation trial at Tarlee, South Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35 (865-876).

Young, R. R., Wilson, B., Harden, S., Bernardi, A., 2009. Accumulation of soil carbon under zero tillage cropping and perennial. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH 47 (3), 273-285.